• Above all, we make a difference.
  • Treatment References

      

    1. Ruddy K, Mayer E, Partridge A. Patient adherence and persistence with oral anticancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 59(1):56-66, 2009.
    2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 347(16):1233-41, 2002.
    3. Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, et al. for the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 378(9804):1707-16, 2011.
    4. National Cancer Institute. Lymphedema – patient version. http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects/lymphedema/lymphedema-pdq, 2019.
    5. Wong SM, Freedman RA, Sagara Y, Aydogan F, Barry WT, Golshan M. Growing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy despite no improvement in long-term survival for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 265(3):581-589, 2017.
    6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Breast cancer V.2.2020. http://www.nccn.org/, 2020.
    7. Patrick JL, Hasse ME, Feinglass J, Khan SA. Trends in adherence to NCCN guidelines for breast conserving therapy in women with Stage I and II breast cancer: Analysis of the 1998-2008 National Cancer Data Base. Surg Oncol. 26(4):359-367, 2017.
    8. National Cancer Institute. Radiation therapy and you: support for people with cancer. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/patient-education/radiationttherapy.pdf, 2016.
    9. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 14(6):500-15, 2013.
    10. Taylor C, Correa C, Duane FK, et al. for the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Estimating the risks of breast cancer radiotherapy: evidence from modern radiation doses to the lungs and heart and from previous randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 35(15):1641-1649, 2017.
    11. Kirova YM, De Rycke Y, Gambotti L, Pierga J-Y, Asselain B, Fourquet A for the Institut Curie Breast Cancer Study Group. Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities. Br J Cancer. 98(5):870-4, 2008.
    12. Mery CM, George S, Bertagnolli MM, Raut CP. Secondary sarcomas after radiotherapy for breast cancer: sustained risk and poor survival. Cancer. 115(18):4055-63, 2009.
    13. Schonfeld SJ, Merino DM, Curtis RE, et al. Risk of second primary bone and soft–tissue sarcomas among young adulthood cancer survivors. JNCI Cancer Spectrum. 3(3):pkz043, 2019.
    14. Arthur DW, Winter KA, Kuerer HM, et al. Effectiveness of breast-conserving surgery and 3-dimensional conformal partial breast reirradiation for recurrence of breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast: the NRG Oncology/RTOG 1014 phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 6(1):75-82, 2020.
    15. Komen MM, Smorenburg CH, van den Hurk CJ, Nortier JW. Factors influencing the effectiveness of scalp cooling in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Oncologist. 18(7):885-91, 2013.
    16. Rugo HS, Klein P, Melin SA, et al. Association between use of a scalp cooling device and alopecia after chemotherapy for breast cancer. JAMA. 317(6):606-614, 2017.
    17. Nangia J, Wang T, Osborne C, et al. Effect of a scalp cooling device on alopecia in women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer: the SCALP randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 317(6):596-605, 2017.
    18. Munzone E, Bagnardi V, Campennì G, et al. Preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a prospective clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of a scalp-cooling system in early breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines. Br J Cancer. 121(4):325-331, 2019.
    19. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2017.
    20. American Cancer Society. Diarrhea. https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/physical-side-effects/stool-or-urine-changes/diarrhea.html, 2019.
    21. Krishnamurthi SS and Macaron C. Management of acute chemotherapy-related diarrhea. In: UpToDate (Drews RE and Savarese DMF, eds.). Waltham, MA: UpToDate, 2019.
    22. Markes MH. Exercise for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 9:CD005001, 2016.
    23. Mustian KM, Alfano CM, Heckler C, et al. Comparison of pharmaceutical, psychological, and exercise treatments for cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 3(7):961-968, 2017.
    24. Escalante CP. Cancer-related fatigue: treatment. In: UpToDate (Hesketh PJ, Ganz PA, Savarese DMF, eds.). Waltham, MA: UpToDate, 2019.
    25. National Cancer Institute. Chemotherapy and you: support for people with cancer. http://www.cancer.gov/publications/patient-education/chemotherapy-and-you.pdf, 2018.
    26. Ruddy KJ and Ginsburg ES. Chapter 90: Reproductive issues in breast cancer survivors, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    27. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Gynecologic Practice: Committee Opinion No. 584: oocyte cryopreservation. Obstet Gynecol. 123(1):221-2, 2014.
    28. Stan D, Hershman D, Loprinzi CL. Chapter 51: Management of menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    29. Saquib N, Flatt SW, Natarajan L, et al. Weight gain and recovery of pre-cancer weight after breast cancer treatments: evidence from the women's healthy eating and living (WHEL) study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 105(2):177-86, 2007.
    30. Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Shachar SS, et al. Weight trajectories in women receiving systemic adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 179(3):707-720, 2020.
    31. Manneville F, Rotonda C, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Guillemin F, Omorou AY. The impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life during and after adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Cancer. 124(4):797-806, 2018.
    32. Protani M, Coory M, Martin JH. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 123(3):627-35, 2010.
    33. Ewertz M, Jensen MB, Gunnarsdóttir KA, et al. Effect of obesity on prognosis after early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 29(1):25-31, 2011.
    34. Niraula S, Ocana A, Ennis M, Goodwin PJ. Body size and breast cancer prognosis in relation to hormone receptor and menopausal status: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 134(2):769-81, 2012.
    35. Jeon YW, Kang SH, Park MH, Lim W, Cho SH, Suh YJ. Relationship between body mass index and the expression of hormone receptors or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 with respect to breast cancer survival. BMC Cancer. 15:865, 2015.
    36. Goedendorp MM, Andrykowski MA, Donovan KA, et al. Prolonged impact of chemotherapy on fatigue in breast cancer survivors: A longitudinal comparison with radiotherapy-treated breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Cancer. 118(15):3833-41, 2012.
    37. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Cancer-related fatigue. V.1.2020. http://www.nccn.org/, 2020.
    38. Jim HS, Phillips KM, Chait S, et al. Meta-analysis of cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors previously treated with standard-dose chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 30(29):3578-87, 2012.
    39. Ahles TA, Root JC, Ryan EL. Cancer- and cancer treatment-associated cognitive change: an update on the state of the science. J Clin Oncol. 30(30):3675-86, 2012.
    40. Mandelblatt JS, Clapp JD, Luta G, et al. Long-term trajectories of self-reported cognitive function in a cohort of older survivors of breast cancer: CALGB 369901 (Alliance). Cancer. 122(22): 3555–3563, 2016.
    41. Janelsins MC, Heckler CE, Peppone LJ, et al. Cognitive complaints in survivors of breast cancer after chemotherapy compared with age-matched controls: an analysis from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 35(5): 506–514, 2017.
    42. Mandelblatt JS, Zhai W, Ahn J, et al. Symptom burden among older breast cancer survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer (TLC) study. Cancer. 126(6):1183-1192, 2020.
    43. Hermelink K, Bühner M, Sckopke P, et al. Chemotherapy and post-traumatic stress in the causation of cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 109(10):djx057, 2017.
    44. Bluethmann SM, Alfano CM, Clapp JD, et al. Cognitive function and discontinuation of adjuvant hormonal therapy in older breast cancer survivors: CALGB 369901 (Alliance). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 165(3):677-86, 2017.
    45. Wagner LI, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, et al. Patient-reported cognitive impairment among women with early breast cancer randomly assigned to endocrine therapy alone versus chemoendocrine therapy: results From TAILORx. J Clin Oncol. April 9 2020 [Online ahead of print].
    46. Mandelblatt JS, Small BJ, Luta G, et al. Cancer-related cognitive outcomes among older breast cancer survivors in the Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol. 36(32):3211-3222, 2018.
    47. National Cancer Institute. Memory or concentration problems and cancer treatment. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects/memory, 2020.
    48. Azim HA Jr, de Azambuja E, Colozza M, Bines J, Piccart MJ. Long-term toxic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 22(9):1939-47, 2011.
    49. Wolff AC, Blackford AL, Visvanathan K, et al. Risk of marrow neoplasms after adjuvant breast cancer therapy: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network experience. J Clin Oncol. 33(4):340-8, 2015.
    50. de Azambuja E, Procter MJ, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Trastuzumab-associated cardiac events at 8 years of median follow-up in the Herceptin Adjuvant trial (BIG 1-01). J Clin Oncol. 32(20):2159-65, 2014.
    51. Advani PP, Ballman KV, Dockter TJ, Colon-Otero G, Perez EA. Long-term cardiac safety analysis of NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) adjuvant trastuzumab trial. J Clin Oncol. 34(6):581-7, 2016.
    52. Freedman RA, Seisler DK, Foster JC, et al. Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome among older women receiving anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer on Modern Cooperative Group Trials (Alliance A151511). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 161(2):363-373, 2017.
    53. Rosenstock AS, Niu J, Giordano SH, Zhao H, Wolff AC, Chavez-MacGregor M. Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after adjuvant chemotherapy: A population-based study among older breast cancer patients. Cancer. 124(5):899-906, 2018.
    54. Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 376(22):2147-2159, 2017.
    55. Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 361(2):123-34, 2009.
    56. Loibl S, O'Shaughnessy J, Untch M, et al. Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 19(4):497-509, 2018.
    57. Saura C, Hlauschek D, Oliveira M, et al. Neoadjuvant letrozole plus taselisib versus letrozole plus placebo in postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early-stage breast cancer (LORELEI): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20(9):1226-1238, 2019.
    58. Prat A, Saura C, Pascual T, et al. Ribociclib plus letrozole versus chemotherapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, luminal B breast cancer (CORALLEEN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 21(1):33-43, 2020.
    59. Paterson AH1, Anderson SJ, Lembersky BC, et al. Oral clodronate for adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-34): a multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 13(7):734-42, 2012.
    60. Coleman R, Powles T, Paterson A, et al. for the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment in early breast cancer: meta-analyses of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 386(10001):1353-61, 2015.
    61. Dhesy-Thind S, Fletcher GG, Blanchette PS, et al. Use of adjuvant bisphosphonates and other bone-modifying agents in breast cancer: a Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 35(18):2062-2081, 2017.
    62. Gnant M, Pfeiler G, Steger GG, et al. for the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Adjuvant denosumab in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (ABCSG-18): disease-free survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20(3):339-351, 2019.
    63. Coleman R, Finkelstein DM, Barrios C, et al. Adjuvant denosumab in early breast cancer (D-CARE): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 21(1):60-72, 2020.
    64. Mittendorf EA, Peoples GE. Injecting hope-a review of breast cancer vaccines. Oncology (Williston Park). 30(5):475-81, 485, 2016.
    65. Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. for the KEYNOTE-522 Investigators. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 382(9):810-821, 2020.
    66. Nanda R, Liu MC, Yau C, et al. Effect of pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response in women with early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the ongoing phase 2 adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 13 [Online ahead of print].
    67. Bidard FC, Michiels S, Riethdorf S, et al. Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 110(6):560-567, 2018.
    68. Sparano J, O'Neill A, Alpaugh K, et al. Association of circulating tumor cells with late recurrence of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 4(12):1700-1706, 2018.
    69. Trapp E, Janni W, Schindlbeck C, et al. for the SUCCESS Study Group. Presence of circulating tumor cells in high-risk early breast cancer during follow-up and prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 111(4):380-387, 2019.
    70. Garcia-Murillas I, Chopra N, Comino-Méndez I, et al. Assessment of molecular relapse detection in early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 5(10):1473-1478, 2019.
    71. Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Murtaza M, et al. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 368(13):1199-209, 2013.
    72. Bidard FC, Peeters DJ, Fehm T, et al. Clinical validity of circulating tumour cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 15(4):406-14, 2014.
    73. Kelly CM, Juurlink DN, Gomes T, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and breast cancer mortality in women receiving tamoxifen: a population based cohort study. BMJ. 340:c693, 2010.
    74. Regan MM, Leyland-Jones B, Bouzyk M, et al. on behalf of the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 Collaborative Group. CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: The Breast International Group 1-98 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 104(6):441-451, 2012.
    75. Rae JM, Drury S, Hayes DF, et al. on behalf of the ATAC trialists. CYP2D6 and UGT2B7 genotype and risk of recurrence in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 104(6):452-460, 2012.
    76. Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 12(4):384-9, 2016.
    77. Krop I, Ismaila N, Andre F, et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol. 35(24):2838-2847, 2017.
    78. Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, et al. for the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 378(9793):771-84, 2011.
    79. Dowsett M, Forbes JF, Bradley R, et al. for the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet. 386(10001):1341-52, 2015.
    80. Kramer I, Schaapveld M, Oldenburg HSA, et al. The influence of adjuvant systemic regimens on contralateral breast cancer risk and receptor subtype. J Natl Cancer Inst. 111(7):djz010, 2019.
    81. Francis PA, Pagani O, Fleming GF, et al. for the SOFT and TEXT Investigators and the International Breast Cancer Study Group. Tailoring adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 379(2):122-137, 2018.
    82. Xu S, Yang Y, Tao W, et al. Tamoxifen adherence and its relationship to mortality in 116 men with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 136(2):495-502, 2012.
    83. Makubate B, Donnan PT, Dewar JA, Thompson AM, McCowan C. Cohort study of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy, breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Br J Cancer. 108(7):1515-24, 2013.
    84. Chirgwin JH, Giobbie-Hurder A, Coates AS, et al. Treatment adherence and its impact on disease-free survival in the Breast International Group 1-98 trial of tamoxifen and letrozole, alone and in sequence. J Clin Oncol. 34(21):2452-9, 2016.
    85. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, et al. for the Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Longer Against Shorter (ATLAS) Collaborative Group. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet. 381(9869):805-16, 2013.
    86. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial: Preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res. 3(6):696-706, 2010.
    87. Rimawi MF and Osborne CK. Chapter 43: Adjuvant systemic therapy: endocrine therapy, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    88. Ruddy KJ, Winer EP. Male breast cancer: risk factors, biology, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. Ann Oncol. 24(6):1434-43, 2013.
    89. Eggemann H, Bernreiter AL, Reinisch M, et al. Tamoxifen treatment for male breast cancer and risk of thromboembolism: prospective cohort analysis. Br J Cancer. 120(3):301-305, 2019.
    90. Mouridsen H, Giobbie-Hurder A, Goldhirsch A, et al. for the BIG 1-98 Collaborative Group. Letrozole therapy alone or in sequence with tamoxifen in women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 361(8):766-76, 2009.
    91. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M, et al. for the ATAC/LATTE investigators. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 11(12):1135-41, 2010.
    92. Bliss JM, Kilburn LS, Coleman RE, et al. Disease-related outcomes with long-term follow-up: an updated analysis of the intergroup exemestane study. J Clin Oncol. 30(7):709-17, 2012.
    93. Burstein HJ, Lacchetti C, Anderson H, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 37(5):423-438, 2019.
    94. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI, et al. Aromatase-inhibitor adjuvant therapy to 10 years. N Engl J Med. 375(3):209-19, 2016.
    95. De Placido S, Gallo C, De Laurentiis M, et al. for the GIM Investigators. Adjuvant anastrozole versus exemestane versus letrozole, upfront or after 2 years of tamoxifen, in endocrine-sensitive breast cancer (FATA-GIM3): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 19(4):474-485, 2018.
    96. Goldvaser H, Barnes TA, Šeruga B, et al. Toxicity of extended adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 110(1): djx141, 2018.
    97. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, et al. for the NCIC CTG MAP.3 Study Investigators. Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 364(25):2381-91, 2011.
    98. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, et al. on behalf of the IBIS-II investigators. Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 383(9922):1041-8, 2014.
    99. Dent SF, Gaspo R, Kissner M, Pritchard KI. Aromatase inhibitor therapy: toxicities and management strategies in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 126(2):295-310, 2011.
    100. Amir E, Seruga B, Niraula S, Carlsson L, Ocaña A. Toxicity of adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 103(17):1299-309, 2011.
    101. Beckwée D, Leysen L, Meuwis K, Adriaenssens N. Prevalence of aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 25(5):1673-1686, 2017.
    102. Spagnolo F, Sestak I, Howell A, Forbes JF, Cuzick J. Anastrozole-induced carpal tunnel syndrome: results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II Prevention Trial. J Clin Oncol. 34(2):139-43, 2016.
    103. Irwin ML, Cartmel B, Gross CP, et al. Randomized exercise trial of aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 33(10):1104-11, 2015.
    104. Irwin ML, Cartmel B, Gross CP, et al. Randomized exercise trial of aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 33(10):1104-11, 2015.
    105. Baglia ML, Lin IH, Cartmel B, et al. Endocrine-related quality of life in a randomized trial of exercise on aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgias in breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 125(13):2262-2271, 2019.
    106. Briot K, Tubiana-Hulin M, Bastit L, Kloos I, Roux C. Effect of a switch of aromatase inhibitors on musculoskeletal symptoms in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: the ATOLL (articular tolerance of letrozole) study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 120(1):127-34, 2010.
    107. Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, et al. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 28(35):5132-9, 2010.
    108. Aapro M, Abrahamsson PA, Body JJ, et al. Guidance on the use of bisphosphonates in solid tumours: recommendations of an international expert panel. Ann Oncol. 19(3):420-32, 2008.
    109. Rathbone EJ, Brown JE, Marshall HC, et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaw and oral health-related quality of life after adjuvant zoledronic acid: an adjuvant zoledronic acid to reduce recurrence trial subprotocol (BIG01/04). J Clin Oncol. 31(21):2685-91, 2013.
    110. Hadji P, Body JJ, Aapro MS, et al. Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss. Ann Oncol. 19(8):1407-16, 2008.
    111. Harris SR, Schmitz KH, Campbell KL, McNeely ML. Clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer rehabilitation: syntheses of guideline recommendations and qualitative appraisals. Cancer. 118(8 Suppl):2312-24, 2012.
    112. Tevaarwerk AJ, Wang M, Zhao F, et al. Phase III comparison of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (E-3193, INT-0142): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 32(35):3948-58, 2014.
    113. Ribi K, Luo W, Bernhard J, et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression versus tamoxifen alone in premenopausal women with early breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial. J Clin Oncol. 34(14):1601-10, 2016.
    114. Burstein HJ, Lacchetti C, Anderson H, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical practice guideline update on ovarian suppression. J Clin Oncol. 34(14):1689-701, 2016.
    115. Rakha EA, Pinder SE, Bartlett JM, et al. for the National Coordinating Committee for Breast Pathology. Updated UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol. 68(2):93-9, 2015.
    116. Joe BN. Clinical features, diagnosis, and staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer. In: UpToDate. Burstein H, Vora SR (eds.). Waltham, MA: UpToDate, 2019.
    117. Gianni L, Dafni U, Gelber RD, et al. for the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) Trial Study Team. Treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 12(3):236-244, 2011.
    118. Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, et al. for the Breast Cancer International Research Group. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 365(14):1273-83, 2011.
    119. Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J Clin Oncol. 32(33):3744-52, 2014.
    120. Advani PP, Ballman KV, Dockter TJ, Colon-Otero G, Perez EA. Long-term cardiac safety analysis of NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) Adjuvant Trastuzumab Trial. J Clin Oncol. 34(6):581-7, 2016.
    121. von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, et al. for the KATHERINE Investigators. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 380(7):617-628, 2019.
    122. Hurvitz SA, Martin M, Jung KH, et al. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine and pertuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: three-year outcomes from the phase III KRISTINE study. J Clin Oncol. 37(25):2206-2216, 2019.
    123. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Kadcyla labeling information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/125427s105lbl.pdf, 2019.
    124. von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E, et al. for the APHINITY Steering Committee and Investigators. Adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 377(2):122-131, 2017.
    125. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Perjeta labeling information. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/informationondrugs/approveddrugs/ucm590005.htm, 2017.
    126. Martin M, Holmes FA, Ejlertsen B, et al. for the ExteNET Study Group. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): 5-year analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 18(12):1688-1700, 2017.
    127. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nerlynx labeling information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/208051s000lbl.pdf, 2017.
    128. Chen Y, Shi XE, Tian JH, Yang XJ, Wang YF, Yang KH. Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 97(20):e10634, 2018.
    129. Mamounas EP, Anderson SJ, Dignam JJ, et al. Predictors of locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from combined analysis of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 30(32):3960-6, 2012.
    130. Li XB, Krishnamurti U, Bhattarai S, et al. Biomarkers predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 145(6):871-8, 2016.
    131. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Biosimilar and interchangeable products. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/biosimilars/biosimilar-and-interchangeable-products, 2017.
    132. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (editors). SEER*Explorer. 5-year SEER relative survival rates, by sex and stage at diagnosis, 2009-2015. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Accessed on January 2, 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/, 2020.
    133. Carlson RW. Chapter 67: Surveillance of patients following primary therapy, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    134. Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN, et al. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the International Breast Cancer Study Group trials I to V. J Clin Oncol. 34(9):927-35, 2016.
    135. Harris JR and Morrow M. Chapter 35: Breast-conserving surgery, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    136. Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, et al. Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 29(29):3885-91, 2011.
    137. Braunstein LZ, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, et al. Breast-cancer subtype, age, and lymph node status as predictors of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 161(1):173-179, 2017.
    138. Overmoyer B and Pierce LJ. Chapter 59: Inflammatory Breast Cancer, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
    139. National Cancer Institute. Inflammatory breast cancer. http://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/ibc-fact-sheet, 2016.
    140. Schairer C, Li Y, Frawley P, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory breast cancer and other invasive breast cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 105(18):1373-84, 2013.
    141. Atkinson RL, El-Zein R, Valero V, et al. Epidemiological risk factors associated with inflammatory breast cancer subtypes. Cancer Causes Control. 27(3):359-66, 2016.
    142. Harris EE, Schultz D, Bertsch H, et al. Ten-year outcome after combined modality therapy for inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 55(5):1200-8, 2003.
    143. Untch M, Möbus V, Kuhn W, et al. Intensive dose-dense compared with conventionally scheduled preoperative chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27(18):2938-45, 2009.
    144. Yang R, Cheung MC, Hurley J, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of outcomes for inflammatory breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 117(3):631-41, 2009.
    145. Ellis GK, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, et al. Phase III comparison of standard doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as neoadjuvant therapy for inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer: SWOG 0012. J Clin Oncol. 29(8):1014-21, 2011.
    146. Matro JM, Li T, Cristofanilli M, et al. Inflammatory breast cancer management in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: the disease, recurrence pattern, and outcome. Clin Breast Cancer. S1526-8209(14)00112-8, 2014.
    147. Tsai CJ, Li J, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, et al. Outcomes after multidisciplinary treatment of inflammatory breast cancer in the era of neoadjuvant HER2-directed therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 38(3):242-7, 2015.
    148. van Uden DJ, Bretveld R, Siesling S, de Wilt JH, Blanken-Peeters CF. Inflammatory breast cancer in the Netherlands; improved survival over the last decades. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 162(2):365-374, 2017.
    149. Moffat FL. Chapter 28: Clinical and pathologic prognostic and predictive factors, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
    150. Mehrara BJ and Ho AY. Chapter 36: Breast reconstruction, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    151. Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC, Kanchwala S. Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: analysis of 15,937 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Am Coll Surg. 217(4):656-64, 2013.
    152. Matsen CB, Mehrara B, Eaton A, et al. Skin flap necrosis after mastectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 23(1):257-64, 2016.
    153. Panayi AC, Agha RA, Sieber BA, Orgill DP. Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 34(5):363-375, 2018.
    154. Roy M, Sebastiampillai S, Zhong T, Hofer SOP, O'Neill AC. Synergistic interaction increases complication rates following microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 144(1):1e-8e, 2019.
    155. Zhong T, Hu J, Bagher S, et al. Decision regret following breast reconstruction: the role of self-efficacy and satisfaction with information in the preoperative period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 132(5):724e-734e, 2013.
    156. Lee GK, Sheckter CC. Breast reconstruction following breast cancer treatment-2018. JAMA. 320(12):1277-1278, 2018.
    157. Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG. Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 153(10):901-908, 2018.
    158. Janowsky EC, Kupper LL, Hulka BS. Meta-analyses of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases. N Engl J Med. 342(11):781-90, 2000.
    159. Singh N, Picha GJ, Hardas B, Schumacher A, Murphy DK. Five-year safety data for more than 55,000 subjects following breast implantation: comparison of rare adverse event rates with silicone implants versus national norms and saline implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 140(4):666-679, 2017.
    160. Dikmans RE, Negenborn VL, Bouman MB, et al. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 18(2):251-258, 2017.
    161. Colwell AS, Christensen JM. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):44S-50S, 2017.
    162. Kaplan J, Wagner RD, Braun TL, Chu C, Winocour SJ. Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 33(4):236-239, 2019.
    163. Ricci JA, Epstein S, Momoh AO, Lin SJ, Singhal D, Lee BT. A meta-analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Surg Res. 218:108-116, 2018.
    164. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/BreastImplants/ucm239995.htm, 2019.
    165. Gidengil CA, Predmore Z, Mattke S, van Busum K, Kim B. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 135(3):713-20, 2015.
    166. Leberfinger AN, Behar BJ, Williams NC, et al. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 152(12):1161-1168, 2017.
    167. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical device reports of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/medical-device-reports-breast-implant-associated-anaplastic-large-cell-lymphoma, 2019.
    168. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. BIA-ALCL physician resources. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/for-medical-professionals/health-policy/bia-alcl-physician-resources, 2020.
    169. de Boer M, van Leeuwen FE, Hauptmann M, et al. Breast implants and the risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in the breast. JAMA Oncol. 4(3):335-341, 2018.
    170. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Risks and complications of breast implants. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/risks-and-complications-breast-implants, 2019.
    171. Sarik JR, Bank J, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Superficial inferior epigastric artery: learning curve versus reality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137(1):1e-6e, 2016.
    172. LoTempio MM, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 126(2):393-401, 2010.
    173. Mirzabeigi MN, Au A, Jandali S, Natoli N, Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Trials and tribulations with the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 128(6):614e-24e, 2011.
    174. Zoccali G, Mughal M, Giwa L, Roblin P, Farhadi J. Breast reconstruction with superior gluteal artery perforator free flap: 8 years of experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 72(10):1623-1631, 2019.
    175. Yi M, Kronowitz SJ, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Local, regional, and systemic recurrence rates in patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy compared with conventional mastectomy. Cancer. 117(5):916-24, 2011.
    176. Romics L Jr, Chew BK, Weiler-Mithoff E, et al. Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 99(6):799-806, 2012.
    177. Mota BS, Riera R, Ricci MD, et al. Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 11:CD008932, 2016.
    178. Tang R, Coopey SB, Merrill AL, et al. Positive nipple margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies: rates, management, and oncologic safety. J Am Coll Surg. 222(6):1149-55, 2016.
    179. Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 225(3):361-365, 2017.
    180. Wu ZY, Kim HJ, Lee JW, et al. Breast cancer recurrence in the nipple-areola complex after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 154(11):1030-1037, 2019.
    181. Valero MG, Muhsen S, Moo TA, et al. Increase in utilization of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: indications, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 27(2):344-351, 2020.
    182. Jakub JW, Peled AW, Gray RJ, et al. Oncologic safety of prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in a population with BRCA mutations: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Surg. 153(2):123-129, 2018.
    183. American Cancer Society. What to expect after breast reconstruction surgery. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/reconstruction-surgery/what-to-expect-after-breast-reconstruction-surgery.html, 2019.
    184. U.S. Department of Labor. Your rights after a mastectomy. https://www.dol.gov/sites/default/files/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/publications/your-rights-after-a-mastectomy.pdf, 2018.
    185. Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American society of clinical oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 30(14):1715-24, 2012.
    186. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer treatment during pregnancy. http://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/patient/pregnancy-breast-treatment-pdq, 2019.
    187. Litton JK and Theriault RL. Chapter 65: Breast cancer during pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy in breast cancer survivors, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    188. Loibl S, Schmidt A, Gentilini O, et al. Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: adapting recent advances in breast cancer care for pregnant patients. JAMA Oncol. 1(8):1145-53, 2015.
    189. Amant F, von Minckwitz G, Han SN, et al. Prognosis of women with primary breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: results from an international collaborative study. J Clin Oncol. 31(20):2532-9, 2013.
    190. Johansson ALV, Andersson TM, Hsieh CC, et al. Tumor characteristics and prognosis in women with pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 142(7):1343-1354, 2018.
    191. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2019-2020. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2019.
    192. Partridge AH, Goldhirsch A, Gelber S, Gelber RD. Chapter 85: Breast Cancer in Younger Women, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
    193. Partridge A, Gelber S, Gelber RD, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Goldhirsch A, Winer E. Age of menopause among women who remain premenopausal following treatment for early breast cancer: long-term results from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials V and VI. Eur J Cancer. 43(11):1646-53, 2007.
    194. Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 360(9):902-11, 2009.
    195. Moore HC, Unger JM, Phillips KA, et al. for the POEMS/S0230 Investigators. Goserelin for ovarian protection during breast-cancer adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 372(10):923-32, 2015.
    196. Lambertini M, Boni L, Michelotti A, et al. for the GIM Study Group. Ovarian suppression with triptorelin during adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy and long-term ovarian function, pregnancies, and disease-free survival: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 314(24):2632-40, 2015.
    197. Munhoz RR, Pereira AA, Sasse AD, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian function preservation in premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2(1):65-73, 2016.
    198. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2020. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2020.
    199. Anderson WF, Jatoi I, Tse J, Rosenberg PS. Male breast cancer: a population-based comparison with female breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 28(2):232-9, 2010.
    200. Jain S and Gradishar WJ. Chapter 61: Male breast cancer, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    201. National Cancer Institute. Male breast cancer treatment. http://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/patient/male-breast-treatment-pdq, 2019.
    202. American Cancer Society. Can breast cancer in men be found early? https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer-in-men/detection-diagnosis-staging/detection.html, 2018.
    203. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (editors). SEER*Explorer. Breast cancer 5-year SEER survival rates, 2009-2015, by sex and race/ethnicity. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Accessed on January 3, 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/, 2020.
    204. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (editors). SEER*Explorer. Breast cancer SEER survival rates by time since diagnosis, 2000-2015, by sex. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Accessed on January 3, 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/, 2020.
    205. Yadav S, Karam D, Bin Riaz I, et al. Male breast cancer in the United States: treatment patterns and prognostic factors in the 21st century. Cancer. 126(1):26-36, 2020.
    206. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Genetic/familial high-risk assessment—breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer. Version 1.2020. http://www.nccn.org, 2020.
    207. Tai YC, Domchek S, Parmigiani G, Chen S. Breast cancer risk among male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 99(23):1811-4, 2007.
    208. Lecarpentier J, Silvestri V, Kuchenbaecker KB, et al. Prediction of breast and prostate cancer risks in male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers using polygenic risk scores. J Clin Oncol. 35(20):2240-2250, 2017.
    209. National Cancer Institute. Genetics of breast and gynecologic cancers: High-penetrance breast and/or gynecologic cancer susceptibility genes. https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/hp/breast-ovarian-genetics-pdq#link/_113_toc, 2019.
    210. Liede A, Karlan BY, Narod SA. Cancer risks for male carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a review of the literature. J Clin Oncol. 22(4):735-42, 2004.
    211. Leongamornlert D, Mahmud N, Tymrakiewicz M, et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations increase prostate cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 106(10):1697-701, 2012.
    212. Oh M, Alkhushaym N, Fallatah S, et al. The association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with prostate cancer risk, frequency, and mortality: A meta-analysis. Prostate. 79(8):880-895, 2019.
    213. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 353(5):487-97, 2005.
    214. American Cancer Society. What are the phases of clinical trials? https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/clinical-trials/what-you-need-to-know/phases-of-clinical-trials.html, 2017.
    215. Cancer Research UK. Phases of clinical trials. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/find-a-clinical-trial/what-clinical-trials-are/phases-of-clinical-trials#phase0, 2019.
    216. Murgo AJ, Kummar S, Rubinstein L, et al. Designing phase 0 cancer clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res. 14(12):3675-82, 2008.
    217. National Cancer Institute. Questions to ask your doctor about treatment clinical trials. http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials/questions, 2020.
    218. Reich M, Lesur A, Perdrizet-Chevallier C. Depression, quality of life and breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 110(1):9-17, 2008.
    219. Schreiber JA, Brockopp DY. Twenty-five years later--what do we know about religion/spirituality and psychological well-being among breast cancer survivors? A systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 6(1):82-94, 2012.
    220. Cherny NI and Truong PT. Chapter 79: Brachial plexopathy in patients with breast cancer, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 5th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
    221. Johannsen M, Christensen S, Zachariae R, Jensen AB. Socio-demographic, treatment-related, and health behavioral predictors of persistent pain 15 months and 7-9 years after surgery: a nationwide prospective study of women treated for primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 152(3):645-658, 2015.
    222. Vilholm OJ, Cold S, Rasmussen L, Sindrup SH. The postmastectomy pain syndrome: an epidemiological study on the prevalence of chronic pain after surgery for breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 99:604-610, 2008.
    223. Gärtner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 302(18):1985-92, 2009.
    224. Schmitz KH, Speck RM, Rye SA, DiSipio T, Hayes SC. Prevalence of breast cancer treatment sequelae over 6 years of follow-up: the Pulling Through Study. Cancer. 118(8 Suppl):2217-25, 2012.
    225. Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Sfintizky A, Welzel G, et al. Factors of influence on acute skin toxicity of breast cancer patients treated with standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). Radiat Oncol. 7(1):217, 2012.
    226. Grisold W, Cavaletti G, Windebank AJ. Peripheral neuropathies from chemotherapeutics and targeted agents: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Neuro Oncol. 14(Suppl 4): iv45–iv54, 2012.
    227. Teoh D, Smith TJ, Song M, Spirtos NM. Care after chemotherapy: peripheral neuropathy, cannabis for symptom control, and mindfulness. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 469-479, 2018.
    228. American Cancer Society. Developing a pain control plan. https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/physical-side-effects/pain/developing-a-pain-control-plan.html, 2019.
    229. National Cancer Institute. Pain control: Support for people with cancer. http://www.cancer.gov/publications/patient-education/paincontrol.pdf, 2019.
    230. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Adult cancer pain V.3.2019. http://www.nccn.org/, 2019.
    231. Goedendorp MM, Andrykowski MA, Donovan KA, et al. Prolonged impact of chemotherapy on fatigue in breast cancer survivors: A longitudinal comparison with radiotherapy-treated breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Cancer. 118(15):3833-41, 2012.
    232. Fong DY, Ho JW, Hui BP, et al. Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 344:e70, 2012.
    233. Cramp F, Byron-Daniel J. Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 11:CD006145, 2012.
    234. Hayes SC, Rye S, Disipio T, et al. Exercise for health: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a pragmatic, translational exercise intervention on the quality of life, function and treatment-related side effects following breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 137(1):175-86, 2013.
    235. Bolam KA, Mijwel S, Rundqvist H, Wengström Y. Two-year follow-up of the OptiTrain randomised controlled exercise trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 175(3):637-648, 2019.
    236. Bower JE, Garet D, Sternlieb B, et al. Yoga for persistent fatigue in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 118(15):3766-75, 2012.
    237. Cramer H, Lauche R, Klose P, Lange S, Langhorst J, Dobos GJ. Yoga for improving health-related quality of life, mental health and cancer-related symptoms in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1:CD010802, 2017.
    238. Danhauer SC, Addington EL, Cohen L, et al. Yoga for symptom management in oncology: A review of the evidence base and future directions for research. Cancer. 125(12):1979-1989, 2019.
    239. Molassiotis A, Bardy J, Finnegan-John J, et al. Acupuncture for cancer-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 30(36):4470-6, 2012.
    240. Pachman DR, Barton DL, Swetz KM, Loprinzi CL. Troublesome symptoms in cancer survivors: fatigue, insomnia, neuropathy, and pain. J Clin Oncol. 30(30):3687-96, 2012.
    241. Montgomery GH, David D, Kangas M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral therapy plus hypnosis intervention to control fatigue in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 32(6):557-63, 2014.
    242. Lengacher CA, Reich RR, Paterson CL, et al. Examination of broad symptom improvement resulting from mindfulness-based stress reduction in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 34(24):2827-34, 2016.
    243. Abrahams HJG, Gielissen MFM, Donders RRT, et al. The efficacy of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for severely fatigued survivors of breast cancer compared with care as usual: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 123(19):3825-3834, 2017.
    244. Mustian KM, Sprod LK, Janelsins M, et al. Multicenter, randomized controlled trial of yoga for sleep quality among cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 31(26): 3233-41, 2013.
    245. Lengacher CA, Reich RR, Paterson CL, et al. The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on objective and subjective sleep parameters in women with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 24(4):424-32, 2015.
    246. Garland SN, Carlson LE, Stephens AJ, Antle MC, Samuels C, Campbell TS. Mindfulness-based stress reduction compared with cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of insomnia comorbid with cancer: a randomized, partially blinded, noninferiority trial. J Clin Oncol. 32(5):449-57, 2014.
    247. Roscoe JA, Garland SN, Heckler CE, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy and armodafinil for insomnia after cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 33(2):165-71, 2015.
    248. Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Carrillo C, et al. Tai chi chih compared with cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of insomnia in survivors of breast cancer: a randomized, partially blinded, noninferiority trial. J Clin Oncol. 35(23):2656-2665, 2017.
    249. Zachariae R, Amidi A, Damholdt MF, et al. Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 110(8):880-887, 2018.
    250. Kreutz C, Schmidt ME, Steindorf K. Effects of physical and mind-body exercise on sleep problems during and after breast cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 176(1):1-15, 2019.
    251. Garland SN, Xie SX, DuHamel K, et al. Acupuncture versus cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in cancer survivors: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 111(12):1323-1331, 2019.
    252. Lu W, Cui Y, Chen X, et al. Changes in quality of life among breast cancer patients three years post-diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 114(2):357-69, 2009.
    253. Shapiro SL, Lopez AM, Schwartz GE, et al. Quality of life and breast cancer: relationship to psychosocial variables. J Clin Psychol. 57(4):501-19, 2001.
    254. Horgan O, Holcombe C, Salmon P. Experiencing positive change after a diagnosis of breast cancer: a grounded theory analysis. Psychooncology. 20(10):1116-25, 2011.
    255. Perkins EA, Small BJ, Balducci L, Extermann M, Robb C, Haley WE. Individual differences in well-being in older breast cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 62(1):74-83, 2007.
    256. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (editors). SEER*Explorer. Breast cancer - SEER survival rates, 2000-2016, by sex. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Accessed on May 8, 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/, 2020.

    Updated 05/29/20

    010673.gif

    Treatment Home 

       

      

1.7M NEW CASES OF BREAST CANCER IN 2012

NEED HELP
OR MORE INFORMATION?

1-877 GO KOMEN
(1-877-465-6636)