• Above all, we make a difference.
  • Early Detection & Screening References


    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures, 2013. American Cancer Society, 2013.
    2. Schell MJ, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. Radiology. 243(3):681-9, 2007.
    3. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC). Performance measures for 1,838,372 screening mammography examinations from 2004 to 2008 by age -- based on BCSC data through 2009. National Cancer Institute. http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/performance/screening/2009/perf_age.html, 2013. 
    4. American Cancer Society. Can breast cancer be found early? http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/DetailedGuide/breast-cancer-detection?rnav=cri, 2014.
    5. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA. American College of Radiology, 2013.
    6. American Cancer Society. Mammogram reports – BI-RADS. http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/UnderstandingYourDiagnosis/ExamsandTestDescriptions/MammogramsandOtherBreastImagingProcedures/mammograms-and-other-breast-imaging-procedures-mammo-report, 2013.
    7. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 151(10):716-726, 2009.
    8. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society recommendations for early breast cancer detection in women without breast symptoms. http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/MoreInformation/BreastCancerEarlyDetection/breast-cancer-early-detection-acs-recs, 2014.
    9. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast cancer screening and diagnosis, Version 1.2014. http://www.nccn.org, 2014.
    10. Pace LE, He Y, Keating NL. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Cancer. 119(14):2518-23, 2013.
    11. Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 6:CD001877, 2013.
    12. Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomized screening trial. BMJ. 348:g366, 2014. 
    13. Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst. 96(19):1432-40, 2004.
    14. Qaseem A, Snow V, Sherif K, Aronson M, Weiss KB, Owens DK for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Screening mammography for women 40 to 49 years of age: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 146(7):511-5, 2007.
    15. American Geriatrics Society. Breast cancer screening in older women. American Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Committee. J Am Geriatr Soc. 48(7):842-4, 2000.
    16. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med. 338: 1089-96, 1998.
    17. Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 155(8):481-92, 2011.
    18. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 380(9855):1778-86, 2012.
    19. Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, et al. for the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy. JAMA Intern Med. 173(9):807-16, 2013.
    20. Salz T, Richman AR, Brewer NT. Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes. Psychooncology. 19(10):1026-34, 2010.
    21. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. for the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Investigators Writing Group. Risk and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in health postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 288(3):321-33, 2002.
    22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Menopause and hormones. http://www.fda.gov/forconsumers/byaudience/forwomen/ucm118624.htm, 2012.
    23. Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD, et al. for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA. 289(24):3243-53, 2003.
    24. Chlebowski RT, Anderson G, Manson JE, et al. Estrogen alone in postmenopausal women and breast cancer detection by means of mammography and breast biopsy. J Clin Oncol. 28(16):2690-7, 2010.
    25. McTiernan A, Martin CF, Peck JD, et al. for the Women's Health Initiative Mammogram Density Study Investigators. Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: women's health initiative randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 97(18):1366-76, 2005.
    26. Stefanick ML, Anderson GL, Margolis KL, et al. for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Effects of conjugated equine estrogens on breast cancer and mammography screening in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy. JAMA. 295(14):1647-57, 2006.
    27. McTiernan A, Chlebowski RT, Martin C, et al. for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Conjugated equine estrogen influence on mammographic density in postmenopausal women in a substudy of the women's health initiative randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 27(36):6135-43, 2009.
    28. Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, et al. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology. 259(1):72-84, 2011.
    29. Rawashdeh MA, Lee WB, Bourne RM, et al. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings. Radiology. 269(1):61-7, 2013. 
    30. Théberge I, Chang SL, Vandal N, et al. Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a canadian organized screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 106(3):djt461, 2014.
    31. Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, et al. Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 100(12):876-87, 2008.
    32. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 225(1):165-75, 2002.
    33. Oestreicher N, Lehman CD, Seger DJ, Buist DS, White E. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 184(2):428-32, 2005.
    34. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2014. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2014.
    35. Morrow M and Harris JR. Chapter 26: Ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2010.
    36. Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology. 258(1):98-105, 2011.
    37. de Gelder R, Draisma G, Heijnsdijk EA, de Koning HJ. Population-based mammography screening below age 50: balancing radiation-induced vs prevented breast cancer deaths. Br J Cancer. 104(7):1214-20, 2011.
    38. Sechopoulos I, Hendrick RE. Mammography and the risk of thyroid cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(3):705-7, 2012.
    39. Chiarelli AM, Majpruz V, Brown P, Thriault M, Shumak R, Mai V. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 101(18):1236-43, 2009.
    40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cancer: Symptoms of breast cancer. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/basic_info/symptoms.htm, 2013.
    41. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer treatment: general information about breast cancer. Washington, DC, National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/Patient#Keypoint4, 2013.
    42. Kosters JP, Gotzsche PC. Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 3: CD003373, 2008.
    43. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 23(33):8469-76, 2005.
    44. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 148(9):671-9, 2008.
    45. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. for the American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 57(2):75-89, 2007.
    46. Chiarelli AM, Prummel MV, Muradali D, et al. Effectiveness of screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging and mammography: results of the initial screen from the Ontario High Risk Breast Screening Program. J Clin Oncol. 32(21):2224-30, 2014.
    47. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. for the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 307(13):1394-404, 2012.
    48. Wisinski KB and Gradishar WJ. Chapter 64: Male Breast Cancer. In Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 34thrd edition. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2010.
    49. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Breast cancer – male. http://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/breast-cancer-male/symptoms, 2010.
    50. National Cancer Institute. Male breast cancer treatment. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/malebreast/Patient, 2014.
    51. Isaacs C, Peshkin BN, Schwartz M. Chapter 19: Genetic Testing and Management of Patients with Hereditary Breast Cancer, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    52. Liede A, Karlan BY, Narod SA. Cancer risks for male carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a review of the literature. J Clin Oncol. 22(4):735-42, 2004.
    53. Tai YC, Domchek S, Parmigiani G, Chen S. Breast cancer risk among male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 99(23):1811-4, 2007.
    54. Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 25(11):1329-33, 2007.
    55. Thorlacius S, Sigurdsson S, Bjarnadottir H, et al. Study of a single BRCA2 mutation with high carrier frequency in a small population. Am J Hum Genet. 60(5): 1079–1084, 1997.
    56. Orr N, Lemnrau A, Cooke R, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 44(11):1182-4, 2012.
    57. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. for the ACRIN Trial 6667 Investigators Group. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 356(13):1295-303, 2007.
    58. Bernard JR Jr, Vallow LA, DePeri ER, et al. In newly diagnosed breast cancer, screening MRI of the contralateral breast detects mammographically occult cancer, even in elderly women: the Mayo Clinic in Florida experience. Breast J. 16(2):118-26, 2010.
    59. Pinsky RW, Helvie MA. Mammographic breast density: effect on imaging and breast cancer risk. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 8(10):1157-64, 2010.
    60. Gartlehner G, Thaler K, Chapman A, et al. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4:CD009632, 2013.
    61. Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol. 20(3):734-42, 2010.
    62. Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S, et al. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol. 28(9):1450-7, 2010.
    63. Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology. 257(1):246-53, 2010.
    64. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA. 311(24):2499-2507, 2014.
    65. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 267(1):47-56, 2013.
    66. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. S1470-2045(13)70134-7, 2013.
    67. Mainiero MB, Lourenco A, Mahoney MC, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol. 10(1):11-4, 2013.
    68. Schoder H, Gonen M. Screening for cancer with PET and PET/CT: Potential and limitations. J Nucl Med. 48(Suppl 1):4S-18S, 2007.
    69. Freedman MT. Chapter 15. Imaging: new techniques, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2010.
    70. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging position statement, 2000. http://www.acr.org/, 2013.
    71. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA Safety Communication: Breast cancer screening - Thermography is not an alternative to mammography. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm257633.htm, 2011.
    72. Duric N, Boyd N, Littrup P, et al. Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: a comparison with film and digital mammography. Med Phys. 40(1):013501, 2013.
    73. Mack KP, Pavao J, Tabnak F, Knutson K, Kimerling R. Adherence to recent screening mammography among Latinas: findings from the California Women's Health Survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 18(3):347-54, 2009.
    74. Miranda PY, Tarraf W, Gonzlez HM. Breast cancer screening and ethnicity in the United States: implications for health disparities research. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 128(2):535-42, 2011.
    75. Watson-Johnson LC, DeGroff A, Steele CB, et al. Mammography adherence: a qualitative study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 20(12):1887-94, 2011.
    76. Plescia M, White MC. The National Prevention Strategy and breast cancer screening: scientific evidence for public health action. Am J Public Health. 103(9):1545-8, 2013.
    77. DeSantis C1, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 64(1):52-62, 2014.
    78. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures for African Americans 2013-2014. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2013.
    79. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011. National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/, 2014.
    80. Smigal C, Jemal A, Ward E, et al. Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 56(3):168-83, 2006.
    81. Jatoi I, Anderson WF, Rao SR, Devesa SS. Breast cancer trends among black and white women in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 23(31):7836-41, 2005.
    82. Battaglia TA, Santana MC, Bak S, et al. Predictors of timely follow-up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers. Cancer. 116(4):913-21, 2010.
    83. Warner ET, Tamimi RM, Hughes ME, et al. Time to diagnosis and breast cancer stage by race/ethnicity. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 136(3):813-21, 2012.
    84. Newman LA, Griffith KA, Jatoi I, Simon MS, Crowe JP, Colditz GA. Meta-analysis of survival in African American and white American patients with breast cancer: ethnicity compared with socioeconomic status. J Clin Oncol. 20;24(9):1342-9, 2006.
    85. Curtis E, Quale C, Haggstrom D, Smith-Bindman R. Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: how much is explained by screening, tumor severity, biology, treatment, comorbidities, and demographics? Cancer. 112(1):171-80, 2008.
    86. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: racial disparities in breast cancer severity--United States, 2005-2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 61(45):922-6, 2012.
    87. Wu T, Mendola P, Buck GM. Ethnic differences in the presence of secondary sex characteristics and menarche among US girls: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Pediatrics. 110:752-7, 2002.
    88. Anderson SE, Dallal GE, Must A. Relative weight and race influence average age at menarche: results from two nationally representative surveys of US girls studied 25 years apart. Pediatrics. 111:844-50, 2003.
    89. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 295(21):2492-502, 2006.
    90. Stark A, Kleer CG, Martin I, et al. African ancestry and higher prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer: findings from an international study. Cancer. 116(21):4926-32, 2010.
    91. Warner ET, Tamimi RM, Boggs DA, et al. Estrogen receptor positive tumors: do reproductive factors explain differences in incidence between black and white women? Cancer Causes Control. 24(4):731-9, 2013.
    92. Batina NG, Trentham-Dietz A, Gangnon RE, et al. Variation in tumor natural history contributes to racial disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 138(2):519-28, 2013.
    93. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures, 2013-2014. American Cancer Society, 2013.
    94. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012-2014. American Cancer Society, 2013.
    95. Gomez SL1, Noone AM, Lichtensztajn DY, et al. Cancer incidence trends among Asian American populations in the United States, 1990-2008. J Natl Cancer Inst. 105(15):1096-110, 2013.
    96. Wingo PA, King J, Swan J, et al. Breast cancer incidence among American Indian and Alaska Native women: US, 1999-2004. Cancer. 113(5 Suppl):1191-202, 2008.
    97. Yi M, Liu P, Li X, et al. Comparative analysis of clinicopathologic features, treatment, and survival of Asian women with a breast cancer diagnosis residing in the United States. Cancer. 118(17):4117-25, 2012.
    98. Miller JW, King JB, Joseph DA and Richardson LC for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Breast cancer screening among adult women--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 61 Suppl:46-50, 2012.
    99. White A1, Richardson LC, Li C, Ekwueme DU, Kaur JS. Breast cancer mortality among american Indian and alaska native women, 1990-2009. Am J Public Health. 104 Suppl 3:S432-8, 2014. 
    100. Austin SB, Pazaris MJ, Nichols LP, Bowen D, Wei EK, Spiegelman D. An examination of sexual orientation group patterns in mammographic and colorectal screening in a cohort of U.S. women. Cancer Causes Control. 24(3):539-47, 2013.
    101. Hart SL, Bowen DJ. Sexual orientation and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 18(2):177-85, 2009.
    102. Altman B, Bernstein A. Disability and health in the United States, 20012005. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2008.
    103. Horner-Johnson W1, Dobbertin K2, Andresen EM2, Iezzoni LI3. Breast and cervical cancer screening disparities associated with disability severity. Womens Health Issues. 24(1):e147-53, 2014.
    104. Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Clayton LJ, Evans WD. Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low? Cancer Causes Control. 20(6):1017-28, 2009.
    105. Courtney-Long E, Armour B, Frammartino B, Miller J. Factors associated with self-reported mammography use for women with and women without a disability. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 20(9):1279-86, 2011.
    106. Yankaskas BC, Dickens P, Bowling JM, et al. Barriers to adherence to screening mammography among women with disabilities. Am J Public Health. 100(5):947-53, 2010.
    107. Barr JK, Giannotti TE, Van Hoof TJ, Mongoven J, Curry M. Understanding barriers to participation in mammography by women with disabilities. Am J Health Promot. 22(6):381-5, 2008.
    108. Clark MA, Rogers ML, Wen X, et al. Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability. Womens Health Issues. 19(6):415-24, 2009.
    109. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Women with disabilities. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/women.html, 2014.
    110. Alexandraki I, Mooradian AD. Barriers related to mammography use for breast cancer screening among minority women. J Natl Med Assoc. 102(3):206-18, 2010.
    111. Ballew C, Cummings SJ, Oreskovich J. Reported barriers to cancer screening: Montana Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2007. Am J Health Promot. 24(5):311-4, 2010.
    112. Kalager M, Zelen M, Langmark F, Adami HO. Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. N Engl J Med. 363(13):1203-10, 2010. 
    113. Iqbal J, Ginsburg O, Rochon PA, Sun P, Narod SA. Differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival by race and ethnicity in the United States. JAMA. 313(2):165-73, 2015.
    114. Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Conners AL, et al. Journal Club: Molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204(2):241-51, 2015.

     Updated 01/27/15


    Early Detection & Screening Home



Tools & Resources


Related Video



1-877 GO KOMEN