• Above all, we make a difference.
  • Diagnosis References

    1. American Cancer Society. Benign breast conditions: not all lumps are cancer. http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/UnderstandingYourDiagnosis/ExamsandTestDescriptions/ForWomenFacingaBreastBiopsy/breast-biopsy-benign-breast-conditions, 2012.
    2. Wood WC, Muss HB, Solin LJ, Olopade OI. Chapter 33, Section 2: Malignant tumors of the breast. In Devita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer: Principals and Practice of Oncology, 7th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
    3. Evers K. Chapter 16: Image-guided biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    4. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK. Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 190(1):202-7, 2008.
    5. Bleicher RJ. Chapter 5: Management of the palpable breast mass, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    6. Chang JC, Hilsenbeck SG. Chapter 31: Prognostic and Predictive Markers, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    7. Surowiak P, Materna V, Györffy B, et al. Multivariate analysis of oestrogen receptor alpha, pS2, metallothionein and CD24 expression in invasive breast cancers. Br J Cancer. 95(3):339-46, 2006.
    8. Grube BJ, Giuliano AE. Chapter 41: Sentinel lymph node dissection, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    9. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 349:546-53, 2003.
    10. Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: A metaanalysis. Cancer. 106(1):4-16, 2006.
    11. Xing Y, Foy M, Cox DD, et al. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 93(5):539-46, 2006.
    12. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 8(10):881-8, 2007.
    13. Zavagno G, De Salvo GL, Scalco G, et al. for the GIVOM Trialists. A randomized clinical trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: results of the Sentinella/GIVOM trial. Ann Surg. 247(2):207-13, 2008.
    14. Gill G for the SNAC Trial Group of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) and NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre. Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? One-year outcomes of sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance (SNAC): a randomized controlled surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 16(2):266-75, 2009.
    15. Canavese G, Catturich A, Vecchio C, et al. Sentinel node biopsy compared with complete axillary dissection for staging early breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes: results of randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 20(6):1001-7, 2009.
    16. Nixon AJ, Schnitt SJ, Gelman R, et al. Relationship of tumor grade to other pathologic features and to treatment outcome of patients with early stage breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 78:1426-31, 1996.
    17. Dillon DA, Guidi AJ, Schnitt SJ. Chapter 28: Pathology of Invasive Breast Cancer, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    18. Hansen NM. Chapter 66: Paget’s Disease, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    19. Merajver SD, Iniesta MD, Sabel MS. Chapter 62: Inflammatory Breast Cancer, in Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    20. National Cancer Institute. Inflammatory breast cancer. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Sites-Types/IBC, 2012.
    21. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2010. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Breast. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html, 2013.
    22. Hance KW, Anderson WF, Devesa SS, Young HA, Levine PH. Trends in inflammatory breast carcinoma incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program at the National Cancer Institute. J Natl Cancer Inst. 97(13):966-75, 2005.
    23. Harris EE, Schultz D, Bertsch H, et al. Ten-year outcome after combined modality therapy for inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 55(5):1200-8, 2003.
    24. Untch M, Möbus V, Kuhn W, et al. Intensive dose-dense compared with conventionally scheduled preoperative chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27(18):2938-45, 2009.
    25. Yang R, Cheung MC, Hurley J, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of outcomes for inflammatory breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 117(3):631-41, 2009.
    26. Ellis GK, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, et al. Phase III comparison of standard doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as neoadjuvant therapy for inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer: SWOG 0012. J Clin Oncol. 29(8):1014-21, 2011.
    27. Bae SY, Lee SK, Koo MY, et al. The prognoses of metaplastic breast cancer patients compared to those of triple-negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 126(2):471-8, 2011.
    28. Lee H, Jung SY, Ro JY, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinicopathological features and its prognosis. J Clin Pathol. 65(5):441-6, 2012.
    29. Bentzon N, Düring M, Rasmussen BB, Mouridsen H, Kroman N. Prognostic effect of estrogen receptor status across age in primary breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 122(5):1089-94, 2008.
    30. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast cancer Study. JAMA. 295(21):2492-2502, 2006.
    31. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines for patients: Breast cancer. Version 2.2011. http://www.nccn.org/patients/guidelines/breast/index.html, 2011.
    32. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2013-2014, 2013.
    33. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 30;351(27):2817-26, 2004.
    34. Genomic Health, Inc. Oncotype Dx: Breast cancer assay. Redwood City, CA. http://www.oncotypedx.com/en-US/Breast/PatientsCaregiversInvasive, 2013.
    35. Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, et al. Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol. 28(11):1829-34, 2010.
    36. Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, et al. for the Breast Cancer Intergroup of North America. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 11(1):55-65, 2010.
    37. Solin LJ, Gray R, Baehner FL, et al. A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst. 105(10):701-10, 2013.
    38. Tamimi RM, Baer HJ, Marotti J, et al. Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 10(4):R67, 2008.
    39. Clark SE, Warwick J, Carpenter R, Bowen RL, Duffy SW, Jones JL. Molecular subtyping of DCIS: heterogeneity of breast cancer reflected in pre-invasive disease. Br J Cancer. 104(1):120-7, 2011.
    40. Potemski P, Kusinska R, Watala C, Pluciennik E, Bednarek AK, Kordek R. Prognostic relevance of basal cytokeratin expression in operable breast cancer. Oncology. 69(6):478-85, 2005.
    41. Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS, et al. The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genomics. 7:96, 2006.
    42. Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L, et al. Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 355(6):560-9, 2006.
    43. Voduc KD, Cheang MC, Tyldesley S, Gelmon K, Nielsen TO, Kennecke H. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol. 28(10):1684-91, 2010.
    44. Carey LA. Molecular intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer. In: UpToDate. Hayes DF, Dizon DS (eds.). Waltham, MA: UpToDate, 2013.
    45. Koboldt DC, Fulton RS, McLellan MD, et al. for the Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 490(7418):61-70, 2012.
    46. Metzger-Filho O, Sun Z, Viale G, et al. Patterns of recurrence and outcome according to breast cancer subtypes in lymph node-negative disease: results from international breast cancer study group trials VIII and IX. J Clin Oncol. 31(25):3083-90, 2013.
    47. Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, et al. Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 29(29):3885-91, 2011.
    48. Lund MJ, Butler EN, Hair BY, et al. Age/race differences in HER2 testing and in incidence rates for breast cancer triple subtypes: a population-based study and first report. Cancer. 116(11):2549-59, 2010.
    49. Haque R, Ahmed SA, Inzhakova G, et al. Impact of breast cancer subtypes and treatment on survival: an analysis spanning two decades. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 21(10):1848-55, 2012.
    50. Turner NC, Reis-Filho JS. Basal-like breast cancer and the BRCA1 phenotype. Oncogene. 25(43):5846-53, 2006.
    51. Yang XR, Sherman ME, Rimm DL, et al. Differences in risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypes in a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 16(3):439-43, 2007.
    52. Millikan RC, Newman B, Tse CK, et al. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 109(1):123-139, 2008.
    53. Stead LA, Lash TL, Sobieraj JE, et al. Triple-negative breast cancers are increased in black women regardless of age or body mass index. Breast Cancer Res. 11(2):R18, 2009.
    54. Amirikia KC, Mills P, Bush J, Newman LA. Higher population-based incidence rates of triple-negative breast cancer among young African-American women: Implications for breast cancer screening recommendations. Cancer. 117(12):2747-53, 2011.
    55. Atchley DP, Albarracin CT, Lopez A, et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26(26):4282-8, 2008.
    56. Hartman AR, Kaldate RR, Sailer LM, et al. Prevalence of BRCA mutations in an unselected population of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer. 118(11):2787-95, 2012.
    57. Millar EK, Graham PH, O'Toole SA, et al. Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. J Clin Oncol. 27(28):4701-8, 2009.
    58. Yehiely F, Moyano JV, Evans JR, Nielsen TO, Cryns VL. Deconstructing the molecular portrait of basal-like breast cancer. Trends Mol Med. 12(11):537-44, 2006.
    59. Kim MJ, Ro JY, Ahn SH, Kim HH, Kim SB, Gong G. Clinicopathologic significance of the basal-like subtype of breast cancer: a comparison with hormone receptor and Her2/neu-overexpressing phenotypes. Hum Pathol. 37(9):1217-26, 2006.
    60. Yang XR, Chang-Claude J, Goode EL, et al. Associations of breast cancer risk factors with tumor subtypes: a pooled analysis from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 103(3):250-63, 2011.
    61. Ihemelandu CU, Leffall LD Jr, Dewitty RL, et al. Molecular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal African-American women, tumor biologic factors and clinical outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 14(10):2994-3003, 2007.
    62. Bowen RL, Duffy SW, Ryan DA, Hart IR, Jones JL. Early onset of breast cancer in a group of British black women. Br J Cancer. 98(2):277-81, 2008.
    63. Lund MJ, Trivers KF, Porter PL, et al. Race and triple negative threats to breast cancer survival: a population-based study in Atlanta, GA. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 113(2):357-70, 2009.
    64. Phipps AI, Chlebowski RT, Prentice R, et al. Reproductive history and oral contraceptive use in relation to risk of triple-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 103(6):470-7, 2011.
    65. Gaudet MM, Press MF, Haile RW, et al. Risk factors by molecular subtypes of breast cancer across a population-based study of women 56 years or younger. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 130(2):587-97, 2011.
    66. Palmer JR, Boggs DA, Wise LA, Ambrosone CB, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Parity and lactation in relation to estrogen receptor negative breast cancer in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 20(9):1883-91, 2011.
    67. Tamimi RM, Colditz GA, Hazra A, et al. Traditional breast cancer risk factors in relation to molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 131(1):159-67, 2012.
    68. Li CI, Beaber EF, Tang MT, Porter PL, Daling JR, Malone KE. Reproductive factors and risk of estrogen receptor positive, triple-negative, and HER2-neu overexpressing breast cancer among women 20-44 years of age. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 137(2):579-87, 2013.
    69. Shinde SS, Forman MR, Kuerer HM, et al. Higher parity and shorter breastfeeding duration: association with triple-negative phenotype of breast cancer. Cancer. 116(21):4933-43, 2010.
    70. Lin NU, Vanderplas A, Hughes ME, et al. Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple-negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cancer. 118(22):5463-72, 2012.
    71. Warner ET, Tamimi RM, Boggs DA, et al. Estrogen receptor positive tumors: do reproductive factors explain differences in incidence between black and white women? Cancer Causes Control. 24(4):731-9, 2013.
    72. Pierobon M, Frankenfeld CL. Obesity as a risk factor for triple-negative breast cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 137(1):307-14, 2013.
    73. DeMartini W, Lehman C, Partridge S. Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence-based clinical applications. Acad Radiol. 15(4):408-16, 2008.
    74. Harnan SE, Cooper KL, Meng Y, et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 37(11):928-36, 2011.
    75. Feigelson HS, James TA, Single RM, et al. Factors associated with the frequency of initial total mastectomy: results of a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg. 216(5):966-75, 2013.
    76. Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 257(2):249-55, 2013.
    77. Killelea BK, Long JB, Chagpar AB, et al. Trends and clinical implications of preoperative breast MRI in Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 141(1):155-63, 2013.
    78. Förnvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O, et al. Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol. 51(3):240-7, 2010.
    79. Helvie MA. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications. Radiol Clin North Am. 48(5):917-29, 2010.
    80. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology. 266(1):104-13, 2013.
    81. Almubarak M, Osman S, Marano G, Abraham J. Role of positron-emission tomography scan in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 23(3):255-61, 2009.
    82. National Human Genome Research Institute NIoH. DNA Microarray Technology. www.genome.gov/10000533, 2011.
    83. Weigelt B, Baehner FL, Reis-Filho JS. The contribution of gene expression profiling to breast cancer classification, prognostication and prediction: a retrospective of the last decade. J Pathol. 220(2):263-80, 2010.
    84. Prat A, Parker JS, Fan C, et al. Concordance among gene expression-based predictors for ER-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Ann Oncol. 23(11):2866-73, 2012.
    85. Dowsett M, Sestak I, Lopez-Knowles E, et al. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with Oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 31(22):2783-90, 2013.
    86. Cristofanelli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck AS, et al. Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 351(8):781-91, 2004.
    87. Dawood S, Broglio K, Valero V, et al. Circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer: from prognostic stratification to modification of the staging system? Cancer. 113(9):2422-30, 2008.
    88. De Giorgi U, Valero V, Rohren E , et al. Circulating tumor cells and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for outcome prediction in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27(20):3303-11, 2009.
    89. Gazzaniga P, Naso G, Gradilone A, et al. Chemosensitivity profile assay of circulating cancer cells: prognostic and predictive value in epithelial tumors. Int J Cancer. 126(10):2437-47, 2010.
    90. Giuliano M, Giordano A, Jackson S, et al. Circulating tumor cells as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving first-line systemic treatment. Breast Cancer Res. 13(3):R67, 2011.
    91. Pierga JY, Hajage D, Bachelot T, et al. High independent prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells compared with serum tumor markers in a large prospective trial in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 23(3):618-24, 2012.
    92. Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Murtaza M, et al. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 368(13):1199-209, 2013.
    93. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et al. for the American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 25(33):5287-312, 2007.
    94. Pachmann K, Camara O, Kavallaris A, et al. Monitoring the response of circulating epithelial tumor cells to adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer allows detection of patients at risk of early relapse. J Clin Oncol. 26(8):1208-15, 2008.
    95. Xenidis N, Ignatiadis M, Apostolaki S, et al. Cytokeratin-19 mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27(13):2177-84. 2009.
    96. Ross JS, Slodkowska EA. Circulating and disseminated tumor cells in the management of breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 132(2):237-45, 2009.
    97. Krishnamurthy S, Cristofanilli M, Singh B, et al. Detection of minimal residual disease in blood and bone marrow in early stage breast cancer. Cancer. 116(14):3330-7, 2010.
    98. National Cancer Institute. Stage information for breast cancer. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/healthprofessional/page3, 2013.
    99. Weaver DL, Ashikaga T, Krag DN, et al. Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 364(5):412-21, 2011.
    100. Giuliano AE, Hawes D, Ballman KV, et al. Association of occult metastases in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow with survival among women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. JAMA. 306(4):385-93, 2011.
    101. Massimino KP, Hessman CJ, Ellis MC, Naik AM, Vetto JT. Impact of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 and National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-32 trial results on surgeon practice in the Pacific Northwest. Am J Surg. 203(5):618-22, 2012.
    102. National Cancer Data Base, American Cancer Society. Detailed guide: Breast cancer. American College of Surgeons and American Cancer Society, 2005.
    103. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer survival rates by stage. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/detailedguide/breast-cancer-survival-by-stage, 2013.
    104. Ries LAG, Eisner MP and Kosary CL. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1998, National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1998/, 2001.
    105. Harper S, Lynch J, Meersman SC, et al. Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987-2005). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 18(1):121-31, 2009.
    106. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control. 20(4):417-35, 2009.
    107. Harper S, Lynch J, Meersman SC, Breen N, Davis WW, Reichman MC. Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987-2005). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 18(1):121-31, 2009.
    108. Adams SA, Butler WM, Fulton J, et al. Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality in a multiethnic cohort in the Southeast. Cancer. 118(10):2693-9, 2012.
    109. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: racial disparities in breast cancer severity--United States, 2005-2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 61(45):922-6, 2012.
    110. Chatterjee NA, He Y, Keating NL. Racial differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in the mammography era. Am J Public Health. 103(1):170-6, 2013.
    111. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans, 2013-2014, 2013.
    112. Yasmeen S, Xing G, Morris C, Chlebowski RT, Romano PS. Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer. 117(14):3252-61, 2011.
    113. American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2013, 2013.
    114. American Cancer Society. Hormone therapy for breast cancer. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/detailedguide/breast-cancer-treating-hormone-therapy, 2013. 
    115. Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P, et al. An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 32(5):392-401, 2014.
    116. Reis-Filho JS, Pusztai L. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction. Lancet. 378(9805):1812-23, 2011.
    117. Rack B, Schindlbeck C, Jückstock J, et al. for the SUCCESS Study Group. Circulating tumor cells predict survival in early average-to-high risk breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 106(5), 2014.

    Updated 06/24/14


    Diagnosis Home




Tools & Resources


Related Video



1-877 GO KOMEN